The Other Side of Civility
In which the university's expert on all things civil (politely) argues that our good manners aren't just good for others — they're good for us, too.
By P.M. Forni
Illustration by David
Illustration by David Plunkert
This activation of their bodies' emergency systems, however, is not without a price. Neurochemicals such as epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol increase blood pressure, sometimes to dangerously high levels. They affect the metabolism of cholesterol and triglycerides, which contribute to atherosclerosis. Well known to weaken the immune system, they block the activity of the macrophages (the killers of tumor cells). Although one catecholamine-assisted altercation will not kill Tom or Rob, a repeated engagement of their stress response will add substantially to the wear and tear of their organs and blood vessels. If they find themselves often in the grip of hostility and anger, they may sooner or later face serious cardiovascular disease and other ailments. One of the wisest things Tom and Rob can do for themselves is choosing congeniality as their default mode of relating to the world. This time, however, they go their separate ways in a huff.
As children, most of us looked at good manners as something between boring and burdensome that we were expected to do, at our parents' prodding, for others' sake. Growing up, we vaguely perceived good manners as good but still saw them as benefiting others. This view has clear merit. Civility, politeness, and good manners (which I treat as one here) are indeed "something" we do for others. We are civil when we believe that other people's claim to comfort and happiness is as valid as our own, and we back up belief with action (such as letting someone merge into the flow of traffic).
Good manners, however, are also something we do for our own sake. They are good for us because as a basic code of relational skills they help us manage our relationships, which are crucial to our well-being and health. Although as adults we may have developed a more sophisticated understanding of manners, chances are that our early bias (that they are for others' sake) still looms large. This may lead us to the wrong conclusion that in the fast-paced, highly competitive and stress-laden environment in which we live, good manners are a luxury we can't afford. I suggest that we balance this view by looking instead at good manners as a precious life-improvement tool for the very people who have them. Maybe slowing down in the name of kindness would allow us to connect meaningfully with someone. Maybe this would help us in the pursuit of our goals — both professional and personal. This is as good a time as any to look at the other side of manners: the expedient side.
"Manner" comes from manus, the Latin word for
"hand." Thus, manners are ways of handling. We exhibit good
manners when we handle well our daily encounters with
others — when we handle others, that is, with care
and consideration. As relational skills based on empathy,
good manners prove crucial when it comes to establishing
and maintaining connection and rapport. Humans are
hyper-social creatures. We inherited the genes of ancestors
who banded together and shared their prey at the end of the
day's hunt. Group identity inevitably shapes our personal
identity. "Plays well with others" defines the
well-adjusted child, and "team player" the employee every
workplace wants. If life is a relational experience, then
we'd better hone our abilities to relate. As hyper-social
beings, our happiness or unhappiness depends, to a large
extent, upon the quality of our relationships. As a general
rule, better manners mean more harmonious relationships and
thus an increased quality of life.
According to clinical psychologist Arthur Ciaramicoli, the
co-author, with Katherine Ketcham, of The Power of
Empathy, empathy benefits the very person who has this
emotional ability: "Individuals who have high relational
skills are more successful personally and professionally.
People who have developed the capacity for empathy, in
particular, have the ability to understand and respond to
others based on the facts discerned rather than with
generalities. When we know how to listen with compassion
and grace we will always attract others in whatever walk of
life we live. Corporate managers, educators, etc., all are
more successful when they have the ability to read others
accurately. Of course, in our personal lives, these
abilities make us better friends, spouses, and parents,"
By being good citizens of our little world of family and friends, we build the foundation of our social support. Common sense and good physicians agree: Social connections are good for us. The meaningful presence of others in our lives helps us remain healthy — both physically and mentally. It is good to be a member of a family, a religious congregation, a charity initiative, or a support group. We all need loyal friends, empathetic co-workers, good neighbors, and thoughtful strangers around us. Isolation invites illness. To cope and thrive we need social support. To build and manage social support, however, we need social skills.
When we treat others with kindness and consideration, we show them that we value them as persons. This motivates them to remain in our lives, and as a result we continue to enjoy the rewards of connecting. Until three or four generations ago, a large amount of the support we needed came from our extended families. Today, as we often turn to friends, acquaintances, and even strangers for support and care, being likable can be a substantial advantage. An elementary but powerful truth to always keep in mind is that social skills strengthen social bonds. Social skills are thus an invaluable quality-of-life asset — in fact, they are nothing less than determinants of destiny.
The strengthening of social bonds gives us opportunities to confide. Confiding is good medicine. As we open ourselves up to a good listener, we get our sorrows off our chests, gain insights into our predicaments, and invite sanity into our lives. Disclosing is often the beginning of healing. Pioneers in mind-body medicine such as James Pennebaker, Janice Kiecolt-Glaser, and Ronald Glaser have paved the way to the scientific realization that confiding is also good for our immune system. There is a direct correlation between self-disclosure and resistance to disease. It is in part thanks to our relational skills that we manage to make and keep the friends among whom we can choose our confidants. The more trustworthy friends we have and the closer we are to them, the more likely it is that we find among them the right persons with whom to open up.
If you are considerate, people will like you and trust you; if they like you and trust you, they will let you help them; by helping them, you will help yourself. The ability to maintain good relationships makes us successful at helping and volunteering, which feels good and is good for us. Researcher Allan Luks has studied extensively the state of well-being he calls "helper's high." This state, similar to a "runner's high," occurs in people who volunteer for good causes. Luks believes that it is the release of endorphins in the volunteer's body that allows him or her to experience elation followed by calm. Although less intensely, helper's high also occurs in volunteers when they recall the experience of helping. Especially when it is not felt as an obligation, helping appears to release hormones and neurotransmitters that strengthen the immune system and are generally good for your health.
Feeling good about ourselves and our relationships makes us
more inclined to laugh. From time immemorial, human beings
have felt that laughing is good for them. Now we have the
science to back up intuition. Laughter increases blood
flow, reduces the effects of stress (by reducing the amount
of cortisol, the stress hormone that can cause so much
cardiovascular damage), and gives our immune system a
boost. Laughter appears to be accompanied by the release of
endorphins, the biochemical compounds that suppress pain
and induce states of well-being. Happy people are less
likely to suffer from high blood pressure and heart
disease. The inclination to laugh seems to have a
protective effect on our hearts. Although our individual
propensity to laugh may be genetically programmed, the
circumstances of life will also determine the amount of
laughter we enjoy. Relational skills can make us happier
and give us the gift of much-needed hearty, healthful
|Common sense and good physicians agree: Social connections are good for us. The meaningful presence of others in our lives helps us remain healthy.||
Such positive emotions are not only good for our health,
they are good for our thinking as well, according to
psychiatrist and author Edward Hallowell: "Basically,
emotion acts as the doorkeeper to advanced thinking. When a
person is in a good mood, feeling content and in harmony
with his surroundings, the door is wide open. He can do
what his cerebral cortex is uniquely equipped to do: think
flexibly; perceive irony and humor; perceive shades of
gray, subtlety, complexity; bear with the frustration of
not knowing the answer, and allowing conflicting points of
view simultaneously to balance in his mind without either
overpowering the other; wait, before bringing premature
closure; ask for help; empathize with others; give to
others; put the needs of others before his own; give help;
Civility, according to Yale law professor Stephen Carter, "is the sum of the many sacrifices we are called to make for the sake of living together." In our times of relentless self-indulgence, it is good to keep in mind that restraint and sacrifice are necessary for functioning well among others. Yes, sacrifice is part of civility. It is a sacrifice, however, that we make for our own sake as well as others'. (Also, we often reach a point where we do not perceive acting civilly as a sacrifice anymore, but rather as a necessary part of who we are.) Civility is powerfully linked to expediency — it is a very efficient and captivating way of pursuing self-interest.
Let us go back to Tom and Rob. In this second version of events, instead of firing an angry salvo, Tom calls Rob to his office and suggests that they try to resolve their differences rationally and fairly. Tom admits to criticizing Rob without giving him clear alternative directions. In turn, Rob acknowledges giving Tom's boss an unduly harsh assessment of Tom's abilities as a supervisor. They both apologize and pledge remedial action. As they reminisce about their long-standing employment in the company, their contested issues seem to be settling themselves, and the goodwill is almost palpable on both sides. Although there is no fight-or-flight reaction this time, it does not mean that their coming together in a civil and congenial way has no neuroendocrine basis.
Just being in the friendly presence of one another rewards Tom and Rob with lowering levels of stress and as a consequence a better functioning of their immune systems. Their stress reduction is aided by the release of the hormone oxytocin, of growth hormone, and of EOPs, the brain opioids. Their congenial mindset is connected to an increased level of the neurotransmitter serotonin in their brains. Together with keeping their hostility in check, serotonin has the effect of invigorating their sense of self-esteem, and thus makes them less defensive and more cooperative. The oxytocin that, in the meanwhile, is generously released, strengthens the social bond between the two co-workers. Under the sway of their feel-good hormones, Tom and Rob can think more clearly and in more sophisticated ways. As their conversation wanders, they exchange good, imaginative ideas on how to run their unit: a welcome, unexpected result of a meeting called to administer intensive care to a relationship between co-workers.
P. M. Forni, author of Choosing Civility: The Twenty-five Rules of Considerate Conduct, is a professor in the Krieger School of Arts and Sciences' Department of Romance Languages and Literatures. For the scientific background on this essay, he consulted Johns Hopkins cardiologists Ilan Wittstein and James Weiss, psychiatrist and author Edward Hallowell, Harvard psychiatrist John Ratey, clinical psychologist and author Arthur Ciaramicoli, Johns Hopkins psychiatrist Rudolf Hoehn-Saric, University of Maryland neurologist Stephen Reich, and Johns Hopkins neurologist Guy McKhann. Dr. Forni extends a cordial thank you for sharing their time and knowledge!
The Johns Hopkins Magazine |
901 S. Bond St. | Suite 540 |
Baltimore, MD 21231
Phone 443-287-9900 | Fax 443-287-9898 | E-mail email@example.com