Report of the Provost's Committee on the Status of Women During the 1993-94 academic year, the Provost's Committee on the Status of Women met monthly to press its agenda of key issues and to monitor progress on several initiatives as well as the activities of university offices which are involved in these efforts. The committee is chaired by the provost and is comprised of faculty and staff representatives from each academic and administrative division, representatives of divisional Status of Women or Affirmative Action committees, the chair of the Women's Forum and the vice president for human resources. The committee has continued to rely on four subcommittees (Academic Issues, Staff Issues, Student Affairs, and Work Environment and Family Issues) to study particular issue areas and bring proposals forward to the full committee. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Provost's Committee Activities ----------------------------------------------------------------- Highlights of the committee's activities during the 1993-94 academic year include the following: Sexual Harassment Prevention and Resolution Program Sexual harassment has been a primary concern of the Provost's Committee over the past several years, and significant time and energy have been dedicated to shaping the university's response. On a regular basis, the committee monitored progress in developing the sexual harassment prevention and resolution program, which it helped to initiate. The committee was especially concerned that options be given for informal resolution of sexual harassment complaints. A number of suggestions were offered to make information and referral and complaint handling more accessible to employees. The committee also reviewed and commented on plans for publicizing the program and for training faculty, staff and students. Monitoring the effectiveness of Hopkins' program will be an ongoing activity of the committee. Performance Appraisal Acting on previous recommendations growing out of an extensive study by the staff issues subcommittee, the university's officers formally adopted a policy requiring the use of annual performance appraisal forms, periodic review of staff salaries for inequities, documentation of staff hiring decisions, and regularized reporting on staff salary reviews as part of the annual budget cycle. These policies were communicated by the provost and senior vice president for administration to all divisions of the university. Job Classification and Compensation System On several occasions throughout the course of the year, the committee addressed the issue of the university's job classification and compensation system. Particular concern was expressed about the current "Knowledge and Abilities" (K's and A's) system which staff members do not fully understand. The rationale for the practice of treating the K's and A's as confidential was probed. The committee generally advocated a more open system. Human Resources conducted an afternoon long workshop on the classification system for the Staff Issues Subcommittee during which the subcommittee members participated in some mock classification analyses. Their conclusion was that the process was a sound one. The analyses seemed to be carried out objectively and thoughtfully. However, the subcommittee strongly recommended that confidence in the system would be promoted by more openness. Human Resources made several presentations to the Provost's Committee on its plans to revise the classification system. The committee felt that input from the Staff Issues Subcommittee would be important as the review and revision of the system proceeded. The Provost's Committee intends to continue to monitor progress in devising a system that is more transparent to staff and less subject to manipulation. Human Resources Data Base Because the ability to conduct staff salary analyses depends upon accurate and complete data, the Provost's Committee has urged progress on the development of a human resources data base. This project, which is supported by Human Resources, was initiated early in 1994. The committee is hopeful that it can be completed expeditiously in order to allow the other projects to move ahead. In particular, a second administration of a staff salary analysis would be facilitated by such a data base. Faculty Salary Equity Working through the Academic Issues Subcommittee, the Provost's Committee monitored progress on a faculty salary analysis designed to examine salary equity among the full-time tenure track faculty and to identify salary differences attributable to gender. The analysis was carried out by faculty members in the School of Hygiene and Public Health using a protocol agreed to by the committee and the deans' offices. Blind data were provided to the faculty who applied accepted methodologies in a multivariate analysis. The results were complicated by differences among the schools in tenure practices and by the lack of full information on disciplinary based salary differences. A process was developed whereby the subcommittee shared the results with the various deans' offices so that they in turn could review and address any instances of salary differentials that were not attributable to differences in rank, disciplinary field, productivity or other legitimate factors. The subcommittee plans to oversee a second administration of the analysis after which it is hoped that the methodology is sufficiently refined so that the study can be institutionalized and conducted on an annual basis. A goal is to include non-tenure track and part-time faculty in future analyses. Time-in-Rank Analysis The committee heard a report on a time-in-rank analysis conducted under the auspices of the Affirmative Action Committee in the School of Hygiene and Public Health. The extension of this analysis to other divisions is under consideration. In order to perform a comparable study on faculty in other schools, a substantial amount of information must come from divisional records, and the close involvement of the various deans' offices is therefore essential. The committee hopes to facilitate consultation with divisions so that similar studies can be undertaken. Student Issues The Student Affairs Subcommittee took a number of steps to promote student participation in cocurricular activities through several cross-divisional initiatives including presenting a proposal for a reception for graduate and professional students from all the divisions. This event was implemented by the provost this past fall. The subcommittee pursued a number of other issues of concern to students, such as health insurance coverage, shuttle service, student legal services, intramural sports; and the use of JHUniverse as a vehicle for coordinating and communicating about internships and laboratory research opportunities on the campuses. In addition to these more general issues relating to campus climate, the subcommittee made specific recommendations regarding sexual harassment prevention training for students. Campus Security The committee reviewed university programs to protect the safety and security of Hopkins staff. Despite the number of campus security incidents, the committee believes that aggressive efforts are being made to respond to employee concerns. Both the Homewood security director and the new security officer at Peabody made clear their willingness to respond to suggestions and concerns. The committee was assured that the new leadership for the East Baltimore security program (then only recently announced) shares a similar willingness. Diversity and Recruitment Initiatives The committee monitored several efforts to enhance the diversity of faculty and staff. Memoranda to officers and deans encouraging diversity initiatives were shared with the committee and judged to be positive steps. Members of the committee were asked to review a search handbook prepared by the Provost's Office. This resource has been circulated throughout the university to assist those conducting searches in enhancing their effectiveness generally and in promoting greater diversity in the university faculty and staff. Organization of the Committee The committee reviewed its structure and that of the subcommittees. It was felt that the subcommittees should meet more regularly in order to carry out their studies and projects. To facilitate this, a decision was made to reduce the number of Provost's Committee meetings. Instead of monthly meetings, the committee will meet five times, and increase the number of subcommittee sessions during the 1994-95 academic year, with time scheduled for several subcommittee meetings in the intervals between the meetings of the full committee. The arrangements for representation from the divisional committees were also discussed and the idea endorsed that divisional committees may be represented at the Provost's Committee by individuals other than the divisional committee chair. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Divisional Committees ----------------------------------------------------------------- Peabody The Peabody Committee on the Status of Women focused on a faculty/staff survey of the work climate. Key concerns included gender dynamics in interactions with colleagues, interactions with the larger profession and institutional issues. Dissemination of the survey results was followed by a very productive series of discussion groups that revealed another set of issues of concern not identified on the questionnaire. Of particular concern was the need for more public information regarding the basis of salary decisions and the need for a forum for interdepartmental staff communications. The committee plans to increase and broaden its membership and to use the discussion group format to explore further various gender equity issues. SAIS During late spring 1994, the SAIS Divisional Committee on the Status of Women was reactivated. While the committee did not have adequate time before the end of the academic year to address a broad range of issues, it did make several recommendations about strengthening security at the school. During this academic year, the committee plans to enhance communications, expand its membership to include students and survey the attitudes and interests of women at SAIS in order to set an agenda for the future. Engineering The Gender Issues Committee of the Whiting School of Engineering included students for the first time during 1993-94. The committee focused much of its attention on the issue of sexual harassment and made several recommendations to Dean Giddens for enhancing the mechanisms to prevent incidents of harassment. The school hosted a seminar for members of the Hopkins community by Freida Klein, who also conducted a training session for deans, department and committee chairs, and administrative staff in the School of Engineering. The committee also discussed the role of the Ombuds Office and concerns about how to ensure that it is organizationally situated to fulfill its mission. During the current academic year, the committee plans to establish better connections among the women associated with the Whiting School, thus facilitating mentoring, strengthening the sense of community and increasing mutual support. Hygiene and Public Health The Affirmative Action Committee of the School of Hygiene and Public Health devoted considerable energy during 1993-94 to an analysis of time-in-rank and to developing recommendations on the basis of the study. Dean Sommer has initiated follow-up action. Medicine The Women's Leadership Council and the Office of the Vice Dean for Academic Affairs and Faculty conducted the fifth annual assessment of recruitment, advancement, salary structure, environment and initiatives affecting women faculty during 1993-94. Progress has been documented in the recruitment of women medical students, graduate students and full-time faculty. No salary discrepancies between men and women were found in any department. Work will continue to implement several initiatives, including instituting exit interviews with faculty members who leave Johns Hopkins, efforts to raise the profiles of various committees which deal with the status of women, and exploring the possibility of having an on-site day care facility available. Special mentoring efforts to assure appropriate promotion of women to the professor level will also be undertaken. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Major Activities Planned for the Provost's Committee on the Status of Women for 1994-95 ----------------------------------------------------------------- The Provost's Committee adopted a work plan for 1994-95 and has a number of initiatives under way. Each of the subcommittees identified the main issues to be addressed during the course of the current academic year. The subcommittees welcome comments from members of the university community, and suggestions about these and any other issues that relate to the status of women at Johns Hopkins. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Academic Affairs Subcommittee ----------------------------------------------------------------- Faculty Salary Survey--Results of the first analysis have been communicated to the divisions for their review and appropriate action. The methodology will be refined and a second analysis will be conducted based on current salary data. The Provost's Office will oversee the follow-up and will review the divisional responses to ensure that corrective actions are taken where they are warranted. Pilot Study of Part-Time Faculty--An effort will be made to develop an appropriate methodology so that a salary equity study of part-time faculty can be undertaken. This will require extensive effort to capture the relevant data and determine the appropriate variables in the specific context of each school, given the wide variations among the divisions. Time-in-Rank Analysis--The subcommittee will consult with divisions interested in replicating the time-in-rank analysis that has been conducted in the School of Hygiene and Public Health. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Issues Subcommittee ----------------------------------------------------------------- Compensation/Classification System--The subcommittee intends to continue to monitor revisions to the compensation system in the interest of improving the classification process. The subcommittee will offer suggestions for demystifying the process and ensuring that the system is fair and effective. Staff Salary Equity Study--A priority for the subcommittee is a second administration of a staff salary study. The subcommittee will explore the extent to which such a survey is dependent upon the development of an HR data base that would contain the information necessary to explain salary variation. In the absence of such a data base, concern has been expressed by Human Resources administrators that the data gathering would be extraordinarily time consuming. The subcommittee wants also to consider whether such a study will contribute to productive discussion of the more overarching concern of the structural employment patterns which place large numbers of women in lower status and therefore lower paying jobs. Performance Appraisal--In consultation with Human Resources, the subcommittee will evaluate the extent to which the performance appraisal system has been implemented and how effectively it is working. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Student Affairs Subcommittee ----------------------------------------------------------------- Climate for Women Graduate Students--The subcommittee plans to discuss divisional efforts to enhance the out-of-classroom climate for women graduate students, while monitoring the effectiveness of the Sexual Harassment Prevention and Resolution Program in addressing the classroom/academic climate. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Work Environment and Family Issues Subcommittee ----------------------------------------------------------------- Flex Time Study--A study of the use of flex time is the main focus of the WEFIS subcommittee for the remainder of the year. The subcommittee plans to administer a survey to an appropriate sample of staff members and to develop recommendations based on an assessment of staff knowledge of the policies and an evaluation of problems with taking advantage of the provision for flex time. Dependent Care--The subcommittee will review the current status of dependent care services being offered by the university and will consider whether there are needs that are not being adequately met. Wellness/Health--While the subcommittee has not formulated specific issues related to health and wellness programs for university staff, the issue is a salient one for many, and the subcommittee plans to begin to evaluate the needs in this area. Respectfully submitted, The Provost's Committee on the Status of Women ----------------------------------------------------------------- Subcommittees-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Academic Issues Nan M. Astone, co-chair 955-1821 Patricia Grimm, co-chair 516-4280 Student Affairs Pam Cranston, chair 516-7185 Work Environment and Family Issues Regina U. Frank, chair 659-8125 Staff Issues Sharon B. Newman, co-chair (202) 663-5802 Virginia L. Walker, co-chair 516-7756 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Divisional Committees-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- SAIS Natalie Reeves, (202) 663-5786 Applied Physics Laboratory Patricia J. Herchenroeder, 792-5653 Engineering Daniel O. Naiman, 516-7203 Hygiene and Public Health Laurie Zabin, 955-5753 Medicine Catherine DeAngelis, 955-8401 Nursing Patricia Grimm, 955-4280 Peabody Institute Regina U. Frank, 659-8125 University Administration Cynthia M. Fenwick, 516-8153