Legislative Hotline

2005 SESSION OF THE
MARYLAND GENERAL ASSEMBLY

 

 

 

Volume 13, Number 7����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� March 16, 2005

 

Here are some of the hot issues as the 2005 Legislative Session develops:

CIGARETTE RESTITUTION FUND BUDGET HEARINGS
MEDICAL LIABILITY DEBATE RESUMES

EMPLOYMENT OF EX-OFFENDERS


BILLS INTRODUCED
STAFF CONTACT INFORMATION

Cigarette Restitution Fund Budget Hearings

 

The House Appropriations Committee and the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee held budget hearings on the Cigarette Restitution Fund (CRF) Program, as they prepare to make decisions on the FY2006 budget.Although the Governor’s budget as introduced, allows for $1.2 million for each of Johns Hopkins’ CRF grants for the coming fiscal year, this represents a fifty percent cut over FY2005’s appropriation for cancer research.

 

At the hearings Johns Hopkins was represented by CRF program co-directors Drs. Martin Abeloff and John Groopman, who presented an overview of the accomplishment achieved since the program’s inception in FY2001.�� Dr. Jean Ford, director of the public health grant, and CRF-funded researchers, Drs. Connie Trimble and Frances Stillman also presented to the committees, describing their efforts and the value of the CRF program to Johns Hopkins and to the citizens of Maryland.Members of both committees expressed appreciation for Hopkins’ many accomplishments with the funding received thus far, as well as their support for the continuation of the CRF program.�� However, they tempered their remarks with a reminder that the Governor has control over allocation of monies in the budget; the General Assembly may only make cuts.With this in mind, legislators were asked to refrain from making further cuts to the CRF program as they deliberate the State’s budget over the coming weeks, and to voice their support for the CRF program to the Governor.

 

For further information please contact Sheila Higdon.

[ Go to Top]

 

Medical Liability Debate Resumes

 

The debate over medical liability reforms resumed in Annapolis with a hearing on the Governor’s comprehensive tort reform bill, SB 221, which was heard before the Senate Judicial Proceeding Committee.The testimony was largely redundant, as the same testimony was presented during the Special Session and during the regular 2004 Legislative Session.The House crossfile of the Governor’s bill will be heard on Tuesday, March 15th along with roughly 20 other reform measures before the House Judiciary Committee.��� Johns Hopkins has decided to support five bills, the Governor’s bill, HB 485, HB 1200, HB 1212, and HB 1230.These five bills cover the most significant tort reform measures such as structured settlements, mandating the venue location, enhanced apology protection, limited immunity for emergency room providers, lowering the cap on non-economic damages, and requiring the use of neutral expert witness.

 

Additionally, SB 836, the corrective bill to HB 2 of the Special Session, has passed the Senate.There was some concern that the bill would fall victim to political infighting as several members of the Senate introduced a number of amendments.However, all of the amendments failed and ultimately the bill passed on a vote of 42 – 4.This bill is important to Hopkins as it contains a provision that delays the implementation of the 2% tax on MCO’s until April of 2005.It is expected that the House will take action on the Senate bill within the next two weeks.

 

For further information please contact Heather Barthel.

[ Go to Top]

Employment of Ex-Offenders

 

On Wednesday, March 9, 2005 Pamela Paulk testified on SB 239 – Pilot Program for the Long Term Employment of Qualified Ex-Felons.Pamela discussed the existing practice Johns Hopkins has of hiring qualified ex-offenders and the great success we have seen with these individuals.She expressed support for the bill as it would encourage other businesses to hire ex-offenders as Hopkins has been doing for years.Senator Ulysses Currie, Chair of the Budget & Taxation Committee, praised Hopkins for this practice and also for voluntarily paying our employees a living wage.Senator Sandy Schrader from Howard County handed Pamela a note after the hearing thanking her for her testimony and because of her testimony the bill would pass.It is expected that the bill will be voted on by the committee this week.

 

For further information please contact Heather Barthel.

[ Go to Top]

 


BILLS INTRODUCED
Budget – Capital

General Health Care

Health Care Facilities

Health Insurance

Medicaid

Tort Reform


BILLS INTRODUCED

Budget - Capital

HB1493 Creation of a State Debt - Baltimore City - East Baltimore Biotechnology Park

The bill creates an $8 million State grant to the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore for the property acquisition, demolition, and site improvements in the East Baltimore Biotechnology Park Project area located in Baltimore City.

 

Effective Date:June 1, 2005

 

For more information, please contact:Jim Kaufman

 


SB0958 Creation of a State Debt - Baltimore County - Sheppard Pratt Health System

The bill creates a $2 million State grant to the Board of Trustees of Sheppard Pratt Health System for the construction of a new psychiatric hospital building to replace the current hospital building on Sheppard Pratt’s Towson campus.

 

Effective Date:June 1, 2005

 

For more information, please contact:Jim Kaufman



SB0995 Creation of a State Debt - Baltimore City - Johns Hopkins Medicine - Pediatric Trauma Center and Cardiovascular and Critical Care Tower

The bill creates a $10 million state grant to Johns Hopkins Medicine for the construction of the Pediatric Trauma Center, housed within the Children’s and Maternal Hospital, and the new Cardiovascular and Critical Care Tower.

 

Effective Date:June 1, 2005

 

For more information, please contact:Jim Kaufman

 

[go to Bills Introduced]

 

 

General Health Care

HB1004 Public Power of Attorney - Health Care Decisions

The bill requires the Office of the Attorney General, in consultation with DHMH, to develop the following forms: (1) a continuous and durable “power of attorney for health care decisions” form; and (2) a “notice of termination of power of attorney for health care decisions” form.

 

The power of attorney form authorizes an individual to designate another individual to:(1) make medical decisions on behalf of the designating individual; (2) visit the individual in a health care facility; and (3) make decisions regarding the individual’s death, including disposition of the body and funeral arrangements. A “power of attorney for health care decisions registry” must be kept and contain a complete record of each power of attorney and notice of termination form, properly indexed, with the date each form was recorded. An individual’s power of attorney form is no longer valid when a notice of termination of power of attorney form has been received and registered by DHMH.

 

A health care facility, cemetery, funeral director, or other person subject to the power of attorney form must comply with the form and is not liable for violating the bill’s requirements for good faith compliance with the form. The bill does not prohibit a health care facility from establishing reasonable restrictions on visitation, including restrictions on the hours of visitation and number of visitors.

 

Effective Date:October 1, 2005

 

For more information, please contact:Heather Barthel

 


HB1021 Medical Decision Making Act of 2005

A life partnership may be created between two individuals if: (1) each individual is at least 18 years old; (2) the individuals are not be related to the other individual by blood or marriage within four degrees of consanguinity; (3) the individuals are of the same sex, or opposite sex and at least 62 years old; (4) neither individual is married or a member of a civil union or domestic partnership with another individual; (5) the individuals agree to be in a relationship of mutual interdependence; (6) the individuals share a common residence; and (7) the individuals agree to register with the Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene.

 

DHMH must develop and distribute a “Declaration of Life Partnership” form and a “Notice of Termination of Life Partnership” form. The forms must be distributed to each county clerk and must be made available at DHMH, on its web site, and at local health departments. Each county clerk must make the forms available on the county clerk’s web site.

 

DHMH must set a reasonable fee, based on the costs of processing the forms, to file a “Declaration of Life Partnership” form. To apply for the Declaration of Life Partnership Form, two individuals must sign the form before a notary public. Once the form is submitted to DHMH, DHMH must register the form and return a copy to the life partners at the address provided. DHMH must keep a certificate of life partnership book, which contains a complete record of each registration, properly indexed, and the date each registration was recorded.

 

An individual who has previously registered a life partnership may not register a new life partnership until 90 days after the date that a notice of termination of life partnership was recorded by DHMH. The form must include reference to the information sheet on advance directives.

 

The rights and obligations of a life partner are only those described in the bill. The establishment of a life partnership registry in Maryland may not be construed to recognize, condone, or prohibit a domestic partnership, civil union, or marriage between two individuals of the same sex entered into in another state or jurisdiction.

 

Medical Emergencies: A hospital, related institution, or residential treatment center must allow a patient’s life partner and other specified relatives to visit the patient unless no visitors are allowed, the facility reasonably determines that the presence of a particular visitor would endanger the health or safety of the patient or member of the facility staff, or the patient tells the facility staff that the patient does not want a particular person to visit.

 

In the case of a medical emergency, two adults must be treated as life partners if one of the adults, in good faith, tells the emergency medical provider or hospital personnel that the adults are in a mutually interdependent relationship for the following purposes only: (1) allowing one adult to accompany the ill or injured adult being transported to a hospital in an emergency vehicle; and (2) visitation with the ill or injured adult admitted to a hospital on an emergency basis.

 

Disinterment, Reinterment, or Burial: DHMH may not deny inspection of a disinterment or reinterment permit record to a life partner of the deceased whose human remains have been disinterred or reinterred. A life partner may give consent for a postmortem examination of the decedent. A life partner of the decedent has the right to arrange for the final disposition of the body. A life partner is a “person of interest” for the purposes of determining a burial site.

 

Health Care Decisions: The following individuals or groups, in the specified order of priority, may make decisions about health care for a person who has been certified to be incapable of making an informed decision and who has not appointed a health care agent: (1) the patient’s guardian, if one has been appointed; (2) the patient’s spouse or life partner; (3) an adult child of the patient; (4) a parent of the patient; (5) an adult brother or sister of the patient; or (6) a friend or other relative of the patient.An individual may not be transported by ambulance between facilities unless accompanied by specified attendants or a specified family member, including the domestic partner.

 

A life partner may petition the circuit court to enjoin the provision or withholding of medical treatment to the patient upon a finding by a preponderance of the evidence that the action is not lawfully authorized by State or federal law.

 

When an individual dies in a hospital, a representative of an organ recovery agency must request, with sensitivity, that the individual’s representative consent to the donation of all or any of the decedent’s organs, if suitable. The decedent’s representatives are, in the following order of priority: (1) a spouse or life partner; (2) an adult son or daughter; (3) a parent; (4) an adult brother or sister; (5) a guardian; (6) a friend or other relative; or (7) any other person authorized or required to dispose of the body. A life partner is considered “next of kin” for the purposes of making an anatomical gift.

 

Nursing Homes: If feasible, spouses or life partners who are both residents must be given the opportunity to share a room. Each resident who is party to a life partnership must have privacy during a visit by the other life partner. A life partner of a resident may file a complaint about an alleged violation of these provisions.

 

Penalties: A life partnership is not established and an individual may not claim the benefits of a life partnership unless the individual has been issued a certificate of life partnership by DHMH. An individual who violates this provision is guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a fine of $100.

 

Effective Date:July 1, 2005

 

For more information, please contact:Heather Barthel

 

[go to Bills Introduced]

 

 

Health Care Facilities

SB0782 Public Health - Child Abuse and Neglect Centers of Excellence Initiative

SB782/HB1341 establishes Child Abuse and Neglect Centers of Excellence. These centers will be local and regional multidisciplinary teams of health care professionals and health facilities with the expertise to diagnose and treat child abuse and neglect.The faculty of these centers will be faculty members from the Maryland Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the University of Maryland Medical System (UMMS) and the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, who in turn provide training, consulting and support to local and regional health care professionals for the diagnosis and treatment of child abuse and neglect in their locale/region.The purpose of these centers of excellence is 5 fold:

  1. improve protection of children in Maryland;
  2. recruit local physicians to gain clinical expertise in the diagnosis and treatment of child abuse and neglect;
  3. develop and guide the practice of local or regional multidisciplinary teams;
  4. facilitate the appropriate prosecution of criminal child abuse and neglect; and
  5. provide expert consultation and training to local or regional multidisciplinary teams in the diagnosis and treatment of physical child abuse and neglect and sexual abuse through teleconferencing and on-site services.

 

This bill provides that the MD AAP shall operate, manage and administer the initiative and that the DHMH shall cooperate and assist the MD AAP in overseeing the initiative.The faculty of the centers for excellence shall:

  1. assist local and regional jurisdictions to develop standards and protocols for the composition and operation of local or regional centers of excellence;
  2. provide training and consultation to local or regional centers of excellence in the diagnosis and treatment of child abuse and neglect;
  3. inventory existing academic and emergency resources available for teleconferencing and facilitate use of resources for investigative and treatment purposes; and
  4. provide financial support to part time local and regional expert clinic staff.

 

These centers of excellence may receive information from DHMH on and may consult on any case from children in need of assistance program; children committed to DHMH or a local department of social services; and children who are the subject of a child abuse or neglect investigation.

 

Effective Date:October 1, 2005

 

For more information, please contact:John Safapour

 

[go to Bills Introduced]

 

 

Health Insurance

hb1520 Health Maintenance Organizations - Hold Harmless Clause - Balance Billing - Authorization

The bill allows a non-contracting provider who provides services to an HMO enrollee to bill, charge, collect, or seek other compensation from the subscriber if the provider provides written notice to the patient regarding the lack of a contractual relationship with the HMO.

 

Effective Date:October 1, 2005

 

For more information, please contact:Jim Kaufman

 


SB0938 Insurance Pilot Programs

The bill authorizes an insurer to create a pilot program in the State, with the approval of the Insurance Commissioner.The pilot program may be for any insurance product line, but the plan must provide information about the pilot to the Insurance Administration prior to the pilot to include the purpose of the pilot, what benefits to the market the pilot offers, and the period of time the pilot will be conducted.Prior the termination date, the Insurance Commissioner or the plan may end the pilot.If the plan seeks to covert the pilot program to a formal line of insurance, the plan is required to submit a formal proposal to the Commissioner.

 

Effective Date:October 1, 2005

 

For more information, please contact:Jim Kaufman

 


sb0961 Health Insurance - Small Group Market - Premium Rates

The bill alters the factors a carrier may use in setting health insurance rates in the small group market to include health when setting the community rate.The bill specifies that when adjusting for age, the carrier may charge a rate that is 60% above or below the community rate; for geography, the carrier may charge 15% above or below the community rate; and for health, the carrier may charge 25% above or below the community rate.In addition, the bill specifies that a carrier may not increase the premium rate by more than 25% of the rate that was charged the preceding year.

 

Effective Date:October 1, 2005

 

For more information, please contact:Jim Kaufman

 

[go to Bills Introduced]

 

 

Medicaid

HB1554 Maryland Medicaid Advisory Committee - Modifications

The bill modifies the Medicaid Advisory Commission to include Medicaid recipients, and representatives of individuals who are economically disadvantaged, children, seniors and the frail elderly, individuals with mental illness, developmental disabilities, physical disabilities, and individuals receiving care from medical adult day care.In selecting individuals from the above groups, the Secretary is required to seek advice from the State Protection and Advocacy System Organization, Statewide Independent Living Council, Developmental Disability Council, the Department of Disabilities, and the Department of Aging.

 

Effective Date:October 1, 2005

 

For more information, please contact:Jim Kaufman

 

 

[go to Bills Introduced]

 

 

 

Tort Reform

SB0682 No-Fault Cerebral Palsy Insurance Fund

The bill establishes a no-fault cerebral palsy insurance fund to pay claimants who are diagnosed as having a birth-related neurological impairment for medically necessary expenses for the birth-related neurological impairment and associated disabilities.The fund consists of revenue distributed to the fund from the Medical Assistance Program Account of the Maryland Medical Professional Liability Insurance Rate Stabilization Fund created by HB 2 of the Special Session.

 

The rights and remedies granted to a claimant who is diagnosed as having a birth-related neurological impairment exclude all other rights and remedies of any person against a health care provider or health care facility regardless of the cause of injury.

 

A claimant is not precluded from filing a civil action against a health care provider or health care facility for a birth-related neurological impairment if there is clear and convincing evidence that the health care provider or health care facility deliberately caused the birth-related neurological impairment.If an initial claim for coverage is not filed before the claimant's third birthday, compensation from the fund shall be limited to expenses incurred on or after the date of filing. The director of the fund may require any person with information about the claim to provide the information the director considers necessary for the evaluation of the claim and the claimant to submit to examination or testing.

 

The director of the fund shall evaluate the claim and determine whether or not the claimant has a birth-related neurological impairment.If the director is unable to determine whether or not the claimant has a birth-related neurological impairment, the director shall issue a determination that the diagnosis is presently uncertain.

 

A claimant may appeal a determination of uncertainty under this subsection to an arbitration panel or resubmit the claim to the fund at least 1 year but not more than 3 years after the determination of uncertainty.If a claimant disagrees with the determination the claimant may file an appeal with the fund within 60 days after notification.If an appeal is timely filed, the director shall appoint an arbitration panel of three physicians who are board certified in neurology or pediatrics to review the determination.The panel consists of one physician chosen by the claimant, one physician chosen by the director, and one physician agreed on by the first two physicians chosen.The claimant and the director may agree on a single arbitrator as an alternative to the physician panel.

 

A vote of the majority of the panel shall be binding on the panel.The determination of the panel as to whether or not the claimant has a birth-related neurological impairment is final and binding on the fund.If the panel is unable to determine whether or not the claimant has a birth-related neurological impairment, the panel shall issue a determination that the diagnosis is presently uncertain.A determination of uncertainty may be resubmitted to the fund at least 1 year but not more than 3 years after the determination of uncertainty.The panel shall promptly notify the claimant of the panel's determination.The claimant may appeal the panel's determination to the circuit court for the county where the claimant was born.An appeal shall be filed within 30 days after receipt of notification.

 

Following a final determination that the claimant has a birth-related neurological impairment the claimant may submit to the fund claims for payment.�� Payments by the fund may not exceed $30,000 each year for any claimant and may be made only for expenses incurred before the claimant attains the age of 21 years.

 

At the beginning of each fiscal year the director shall adjust the $30,000 limit on annual payments to take into account increases in the cost of medical care.Payments made by the fund may not include expenses for items the claimant has received or is entitled to receive under other state or federal law, or from any health insurance policy, nonprofit health service plan, health maintenance organization, or other private insurer.

 

A person may not charge or collect compensation for legal services in connection with any claims arising under this subtitle unless the compensation is approved by the director. The director shall report all claims to the state board of physicians for review to determine whether there are grounds for disciplinary action for failing to meet appropriate standards for delivery of quality medical care.

 

Effective Date:July 1, 2005

 

For more information, please contact:Heather Barthel

 

[go to Bills Introduced]




STAFF CONTACT INFORMATION
Please contact Government Relations if you have concerns or would like additional information. Your input assists us greatly in evaluating and formulating the position of Johns Hopkins on all legislation.

Legislative Session Office
47 State Circle, Suite 203
Annapolis, MD 21401

410-269-0057
fax 410-269-1574


Heather Barthel������������������� [email protected]

Mickey Geisler��������������������� [email protected]

Matt Greenwood������������������ [email protected]

Sheila Higdon��������������������� [email protected]

Jim Kaufman����������������������� [email protected]

John Safapour�������������������� [email protected]
Bret Schreiber��������������������� [email protected]

Cathy Ximenez������������������� [email protected]

 

[ Go to Top]


ACRONYMS


Legislative Hotline is a service of Johns Hopkins Government Affairs.

� 2005 The Johns Hopkins Institutions. Baltimore, Maryland.
Office of Government, Community and Public Affairs.