Legislative Hotline

2005 SESSION OF THE
MARYLAND GENERAL ASSEMBLY

 

 

 

Volume 13, Number 8����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� March 23, 2005

 

Here are some of the hot issues as the 2005 Legislative Session develops:

FY 2006 OPERATING BUDGET

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE

MEDICAID

COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH

CIGARETTE RESTITUTION FUND

MENTAL HEALTH

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND MEDICAL SYSTEM


STAFF CONTACT INFORMATION

FY 2006 Operating Budget

 

The House and Senate are preparing to move different versions of the FY 2006 operating budget.In addition to the budget bill, the two chambers are also moving the Budget Reconciliation and Financing Act and actions on the Governor’s Supplemental Budget #1.Due to the various differences, below is a brief summary of various actions of each chamber that will be resolved during an upcoming conference committee.

[ Go to Top]

Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

 

The House and Senate have adopted language requesting the Department to examine efforts to centralize administration of the various health professional boards to reduce costs.However, the Senate accepted an additional $63,518 budget reduction to the Board of Pharmacy for increased staffing.

[ Go to Top]

Medicaid

 

The base budget includes several costs containment actions, which the General Assembly cannot act on, that include the continuation of $60 million in hospital day limits, a 1% or $15 million reduction in MCO capitation rates, and the continuation of $42 million in nursing home reductions.The Senate adopted language stating that it is their intent that the FY 2006 will be the final year the Department may uses hospital day limits as a cost containment measure.

 

The House and Senate accepted several reductions in the Medicaid program including a $31 million reduction for funds allocated to physician fee increases.These funds were duplicative of the special fund created by HB 2 of the Special Session, a portion of which is dedicated to Medicaid physician fee increases.In addition, the budget was reduced by $46.0 million for the MCO capitation rates.Traditionally, the Department did not include funding in advance for the MCO capitation rates until after the rates were adapted, resulting in a deficiency appropriation.Deleting these funds continues the current practice.

 

The House and Senate adopted budget bill language that requires $6.2 million be used only for the purchase of case management services for individuals who qualify for the Rare and Expensive Case Management Program (REM).The language clarifies that no portion of this funding may be provided to MCOs unless the REM participants voluntarily choose to enroll in an MCO.Finally, the language requires the Department to develop a report on options for reducing future REM costs.

 

The House and Senate have adopted language restricting $8 million until the Department selects a minimum of 8 quality measures and minimum performance targets for MCOs.The language also requires the Department to withhold these funds from MCOs during the CY 2006 rate setting process and adopt procedures to pay MCOs that meet or exceed the performance targets.

 

The Senate adopted language restricting $1.5 million of the Medicaid budget to provide State funded Medicaid services for pregnant woman who are legal immigrants, but do not qualify for federally funded Medicaid.The language attempts to restore state funding for prenatal services for legal immigrants.

 

The Senate adopted language restricting almost $900 million for payments to nursing homes in an attempt to reduce the projected $42 million in nursing home reductions to $32 million.

[ Go to Top]

Community and Public Health

 

The Senate accepted a $609,003 budget reduction to core public health services provided by the Department, reducing the FY 2006 appropriation to the FY 2005 funding level.

[ Go to Top]

Cigarette Restitution Fund

 

Over the past week, there has been action from the Governor and the General Assembly surrounding the Cigarette Restitution Fund (CRF), and specifically the cut to the FY2006 cancer research grants.Governor Ehrlich submitted Supplemental Budget I, which contains language to restore the grants to Johns Hopkins and the University of Maryland by an additional 25%, bringing them to 75% of their FY2005 appropriation.However, the House Appropriations and the Senate Budget and Taxation Committees rejected the Governor’s proposal, favoring their own language in the BRFA instead.

 

The Appropriations Committee adopted language authorizing the Governor to appropriate up to $7.7 million in FY2006 for grants to each of the academic health centers.According to legislative services, this amount was left in the FY2006 CRF budget; it would not be taken from any other CRF program.

 

The Budget and Taxation Committee took a different approach, adopting language that directs the Governor, beginning in FY2007 and each fiscal year thereafter, to include at least $10.4 million in the annual budget for the cancer research grants to Johns Hopkins and the University of Maryland.This mandates the amount of cancer research grants at the FY2005 level, to ensure consistent funding for the ongoing cancer research efforts.It does not prohibit the Governor from appropriating additional monies for this purpose, nor does it prohibit him from amending the budget to reduce this “mandated” amount.

 

B&T also included a provision that directs the Governor to include at least $2 million for the Tobacco-Related Diseases Research Grant to the University of Maryland, beginning in FY2007.

 

Additional BRFA actions on CRF by both committees includes the following:

 

  1. Permanently modify Statewide Academic Health Center Public Health Grants so that the Baltimore City cancer screening and treatment appropriations constitute at least 19% of the total CRF public health spending beginning in FY2007; and keep it at $1.2 million each for FY2006.
  2. Reject the delay of the comprehensive evaluation of the CRF program; authorize the appropriation of $1 million in CRF funds for this purpose.
  3. Postpone Tobacco Study by one year
  4. Reject the recommendation to reduce funding for activities aimed at reducing tobacco use in CRF from $21 million to $10 million - permanently.Instead, reduce for FY2006 only.(Failure to reduce the funding would have resulted in transferring $10 million for the cancer program to the tobacco program).
  5. Mandate that 30% of CRF revenues are used to support Medicaid on a permanent basis.Current law requires 25% for this purpose, but in reality far more is appropriated for Medicaid from CRF.In the proposed FY2006 budget, 54% is used for Medicaid.

 

The actions of both budget committees will be addressed on the floors of their respective chambers over the coming weeks.

 

The House reduced the General Fund appropriation for CRF program administration by $211,357, half of the funded amount, while adding language allowing these funds to be replaced with CRF special funds, thereby increasing administration from 5% to 7%.However, the Senate accepted the entire $422,714 reduction.�� Meanwhile, the Senate accepted budget bill language that requires UM Medical Group to use $300,000 to be expended for cancer treatment identified through the public health program.In addition the committees requested the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene to develop a report, in consultation with UMMG, on the cost of breast and cervical cancer screenings in Baltimore City.The report is to include a comparison of costs incurred by MedStar Health in administration the Breast and Cervical Cancer Program, including an explanation of the costs difference between UMMG and Medstar.

[ Go to Top]

Mental Health

 

The House added language requiring the Department to examine the use of Residential Treatment Centers and the impact of access due to budget and staff reductions.This language was rejected by the Senate.Meanwhile, both the House and Senate accepted a $1 million reduction due to the replication of a capitated program currently operating in Baltimore City to the rest of the state.

[ Go to Top]

University of Maryland Medical System

 

The House accepted a recommendation to reduce the appropriations for UM Medical System by $1 million to $7.1 million by removing funding for the facility renewal at the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center.However, the Senate rejected the reduction, but added language stating that FY 2006 shall be the final year the State will subsidize capital expenses at Shock Trauma.However, the Senate accepted a $221,422 reduction for the Montebello Rehabilitation Program at Kernan Hospital to take the FY 2006 appropriation to FY 2005.In addition, language was added requesting UMMS report to the budget committees on its long-term capital and facility renewal requirements at Shock Trauma.The report is due October 1, 2005.

 

For more information on any of the above articles, please contact: Jim Kaufman or Sheila Higdon

Go to Top]



STAFF CONTACT INFORMATION
Please contact Government Relations if you have concerns or would like additional information. Your input assists us greatly in evaluating and formulating the position of Johns Hopkins on all legislation.

Legislative Session Office
47 State Circle, Suite 203
Annapolis, MD 21401

410-269-0057
fax 410-269-1574


Heather Barthel������������������� [email protected]

Mickey Geisler��������������������� [email protected]

Matt Greenwood������������������ [email protected]

Sheila Higdon��������������������� [email protected]

Jim Kaufman����������������������� [email protected]

John Safapour�������������������� [email protected]
Bret Schreiber��������������������� [email protected]

Cathy Ximenez������������������� [email protected]

 

[ Go to Top]


ACRONYMS


Legislative Hotline is a service of Johns Hopkins Government Affairs.

� 2005 The Johns Hopkins Institutions. Baltimore, Maryland.
Office of Government, Community and Public Affairs.