Ely Kovetz

The Observable Universe: probes of different epochs in its history.

What do I do?

For more details about my research, including links to relevant talks and publications, click on the topics below:

The Cosmic Microwave Background: Exploring the Early Universe

Line-Intensity Mapping: Astrophysics and Cosmology at High Redshifts

Why am I interested?

My research on Line-Intensity Mapping has focused mostly on the neutral hydrogen line (21cm) and Carbon-Monoxide (CO):

Lensing Mass Reconstruction: Due to the accessibility of the 21-cm signal over a wide range of redshifts during the Dark Ages and Epoch of Reionization (EoR), it holds great promise to become the ultimate cosmological probe. We suggested to use the deviations from isotropy that are imposed on the pattern of 21-cm fluctuations by weak gravitational lensing generated by structure along the line of sight, to measure the properties of galaxy clusters. We then extended this work to investigate how well the hypotheses of an extremely large void or a cosmic texture—suggested as explanations for the anomalous cold spot in the CMB—can be tested.
Dark Matter-Baryon Scattering: With J. Muñoz, a JHU grad student at the time (now @Harvard), I set out to explore how models in which dark matter interacts with baryons can be probed through their imprint on the 21-cm global temperature and its fluctuations. Naively, one would expect the baryon fluid to cool down as it driven to equilibrium with the colder dark matter fluid. However, we found that a crucial ingredient to include is the relative velocity between the baryons and dark matter, which leads to a heating effect due to the friction between the two fluids, which in some cases is more dominant than the cooling. It also leads to a new large-scale component of fluctuations, on top of the standard 21cm power spectrum. We showed that future experiments can constrain interacting dark matter in mass ranges inaccessible to direct detection experiments, providing excellent motivation for ongoing follow-up works.
Recently, following the EDGES detection of an anomalous 21cm absorption profile at z~17, we investigated in detail the viable parameter space for millicharged dark matter to explain the EDGES signal. We provided a thorough analysis of the effect on the CMB and the 21cm in the strong coupling regime, and derived the most stringent constraints on this model.
Ultra-Light Hidden-Photon Dark Matter: Ultra-light hidden photons provide an appealing candidate for dark matter. These are (light) massive vector bosons that arise naturally in many theoretical setups, and which generically interact with the Standard Model through kinetic mixing with the ordinary photons. Ultra-light hidden-photon dark matter produces an oscillating electric field in the early Universe plasma, which in turn induces an electric current in its ionized component whose dissipation results in heat transfer from the dark matter to the plasma. This will affect the global 21cm signal from the Dark Ages and Cosmic Dawn. In work with Ilias Cholis and David E. Kaplan, we focused on the latter, in light of the reported detection by EDGES of an absorption signal at frequencies corresponding to redshift z∼17. By measuring the 21cm global signal, a limit can be placed on the amount of gas heating, and thus the kinetic mixing strength ε between the hidden and ordinary photons can be constrained. We showed that 21cm at cosmic dawn can place the strongest bounds to date on ε across more then ten orders of magnitude in mass, down to 1e-22 eV.

Left: Baryon temperatures (three upper curves) without interactions (solid curve) and when adding interactions (dashed-blue curve for the case where the relative velocity between baryons and dark matter is not taken into account, and red curve when it is), as well as dark-matter temperatures (two lower curves, same scenarios). At late times and for DM mass mχ below a GeV, our prediction was cooling of the baryon gas temperature, which would generate a deeper 21cm absoprtion profile (interestingly matching what EDGES measured a few years later). From Muñoz, Kovetz and Ali-Haïmoud (PRD, 2015).
Right: The viable parameter space for millicharged DM to explain the anomalous EDGES 21cm signal. The allowed region is bound from above by SLAC constraints (gray), from the left by stellar cooling (purple), from below by SN1987A cooling (blue), and from the right by the requirement to cool the baryons enough to yield a 21cm brightness temperature consistent with the EDGES 99% upper bound (black). Contours are shown for several values of the fraction fχ of the total DM that is millicharged; each yields an upper bound on the mass mχ. The rightmost limit is from Planck 2015 (red). A portion ruled out by the Neff limit at BBN, valid below mχ∼me, is sketched (light green). From Kovetz et al. (PRD, 2018).

Left: The EDGES Cosmic Dawn 21cm signal (Bowman et al., Nature 2018) is in 3.8σ disagreement with the maximum absorption allowed by ΛCDM. In Kovetz et al. (2018) we present the viable parameter space of the millicharged DM model suggested to explain this anomaly by Barkana (Nature, 2018), based on the calculation in Munoz, Kovetz and Ali-Haımoud (2015). Meanwhile, in Kovetz, Cholis and Kaplan (2018) we show that a robust 21cm detection can place the strongest bounds yet on ultra-light hidden-photon DM (see right panel).
Right: Predominant bounds on the kinetic mixing parameter ε for different hidden-photon DM masses mχ. We show constraints from Milky-Way ISM heating (red) and from the CMB (blue). Our inferred 21cm bounds from requiring that T21 = −100 mK or T21 = −50 mK (black and dashed-black) are two orders of magnitude stronger over ten orders of magnitude in mass and the only ones to penetrate the fuzzy-DM mass range. From Kovetz, Cholis and Kaplan (Submitted to PRL, 2018).

Related talks:

With P. Breysse, a JHU graduate student at the time (now @CITA), I conducted a series of studies of intensity mapping the star-forming line CO as a tool for high redshift cosmology and astrophysics. We first examined different models for the CO luminosity function at medium redshifts and investigated the optimization of instruments to detect the signal. We then tackled the problem of line foregrounds and showed how blind bright-pixel masking can be useful in mitigating contamination in medium-redshift CO maps and Lyα from the EoR (while it would not work for CII at EoR). In exciting recent works, we proposed to constrain CO-luminosity and thereby the star-formation rate throughout cosmic history, by adopting a novel formalism to analyze the one-point statistics of intensity maps, based on P(D) analysis.

Left: Demonstrating the power of intensity mapping - a simulated 2.5 deg^2 field with galaxy positions (left side) and the corresponding CO intensity map (right side). Luminosities were drawn from a Schechter function model (Breysse, Kovetz and Kamionkowski, 2016). Sources bright enough to detect with 1hr of VLA time are marked in red. In the same 3000 hours of integration over this field required for the VLA detections, a low-cost experiment like COMAP can provide the intensity map on the right. From Kovetz et. al (Physics Reports, in review 2017) .
Right: Comparison between predicted constraints on star formation rate density from CO intensity mapping and from existing FUV (grey points) and GRB (orange points) data. Solid black curve ψ(z) shows fit to FUV data. Blue curves show ±1σ SFRD uncertainty forecast with CO intensity mapping, taking into account foregrounds and noise. Dashed magenta lines encompass a 10% model uncertainty band in the adopted CO-FIR and FIR-SFR relations. From Bryesse, Kovetz and Kamionkowski (MNRASL, 2016) .

Related talks:

Starting in early 2016, the line-intensity mapping community began a series of annual workshops to help coalesce and advance the field. The pioneering meeting was a workshop titled “Opportunities and Challenges in Intensity Mapping” which took place at Stanford University (SLAC) March 21-23, 2016 and was attended by over 40 scientists. I initiated and organized the second workshop, “IM@Hopkins”, which was held at Johns Hopkins University in June 12-14, 2017, with over 50 participants.
I then led an effort to develop a document presenting a status report of the line-intensity mapping field following the two workshops. In between, during and after these two workshops, through their presentations, personal writing assignments and feedback on drafts, over 45 scientists (from over 25 institutions) contributed to the 2017 Status Report, while a small writing group was responsible for editing, combining and integrating the individual contributions. The next community workshop will take place in February 2018, at the Aspen Center of Physics.

Related collaboration papers: